Sane Distance Beforeword This is a small work that wants to deal with how one can use one’s own doubts, whether spiritual, social, intellectual and so forth, to somehow constantly create trampolines and stepping stones to use these prefigured vague presences of hesitativeness grappling with one’s own mind into solid affirmations, stimulations, motivation and unimagined success. A lot of books are now on the market, showing techniques of how the individual with a certain discipline, following these prescribed techniques can overachieve and become as successful as now very famous names that have entered the mainstream field as naturally as water take the shape of its container. Although, a lot of the techniques illustrated in these books have their sovereign legitimacy and some of the techniques given by them are extremely relevant, this is not the fundamental aspiration of this little treatise. But how one with a certain self-discipline can unleash creativity with his or her own dilemmas and who knows by persisting in that way discovering greater strengths, greater and more original creative organizing skills, frontally confronting what was once a chaos and a monstrous casuistic case. Chapter 1 A perspicacious question would be: “why the name of Sane Distance?” . Simply it is what the idea implies. A certain positive distance with what one is confronted to. A constructive and fruitful deconstruction of a problem. A clear distinction between I and IT. It is very important to solve a problem to see the I and the IT stand separately and in a second phase, in which exact lines, they are related to one another and in a third phase in which lines they intertwine. It is well known to overcome a question, problem, dilemma; it is of the first importance to fragment, to disassemble, to deconstruct the elements it is made of. In Greek, “analysis” and consequently “analyze” literally means to “put in pieces”. So one must analyze the problem which one dwells to start finding a potential solution. The analysis is actually the sane distanciator, the first phase to a distanciation. For instance, a friend needs a 100 dollars for an important unorganized in advance meeting. I, on the other hand, have 80, but I need at least half of it, if not slightly more to do my grocery. But the friend is desperate and needy and start giving pressure, if I could at least give him, 5 dollars, no 50 dollars, he would be more or less saved, he would carry out the problem to another to get the other half of it. I stay still and give him, half of what I have. He is very grateful and hugs me. He leaves obviously very happy. And I continue to my errands, 10 dollars off on what I’ve planned but satisfied to have lent a hand to a friend. But the lapsus linguae although it made me tick, I ignored it on the spot, now I could not fully screen out what it might have had implied. Chapter 2 Let’s take a sane distance from the situation exposed in the previous chapter. Behind the decisions taken by the protagonists, especially, the moneylender, there were analyses either conscious or unconscious. Let’s try to find the main governing analyses that the protagonist used before making his decision. Facts: 1- A Friend asks for 100 dollars 2- The other,(being asked) has 80 dollars 3- Of which, he has already a plan to use at least half, if not more 4- The needy friend asks, first, inadvertently for 5 $, then 50 5- The lending protagonist gives half of what he had 6- Expansiveness of second protagonist 7- Satisfaction and floating doubt of lending protagonist Deconstruction of Facts -The lending protagonist says at the end, the lapsus linguae of his friend made arise doubt. One can sense, our friend despite his good will, had a doubt since the very beginning of the expose of his friend. One might think why has the lending friend systematically asserted; he had 80 $, although it would not necessarily have meant this assertion was, de facto, purely false. At the very least sensing the doubt, the lapsus reinforces more the dubitative position of the lending friend, nonetheless, because a good friend, is in need and he has good will, he cuts in half what he said to have. The expansive hug, although a sign of happiness from his friend, reinforces---all that in an infraconscious level---the doubt the friend really needed 100 $ in the first place and that what he gave to his friend, makes one think, is way superior to what is really needed. As he goes shopping, he feels satisfaction, because in a way, despite the doubt he feels there acutely, he has done an honorable and at the same time very natural action, because despite the doubt he felt, he acted largely but still had enough to continue with his plan, although slightly changed. He chose, in his way, the just middle between the good will to help and reasonable Doubt. Chapter 3 To put in distance is to put in perspective instead of being put in powerless embarrassment. The purse of mud The torn up bill